<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advertlets Advertisers Pay for Nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/</link>
	<description>My World, Word and Story</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Heh, I so ownage right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, I so ownage right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trashcan</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>trashcan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>u always... LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u always&#8230; LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swift World</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Swift World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Advertlets - Quick Money...&lt;/strong&gt;




Share This
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Advertlets - Quick Money&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Share This<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>If thats the case, I'll be using a frame and putting 20 ads at one shot in that small frame. I'll see how it goes. I'm sorry but I think i clarified that the advertisers pay for less. The title is well, misleading? But I did write in the post that I feel that advertisers are not paying for what they deserve. Anyways, since its not of a problem, I shall put loads of ads as well, but in a smart way of course. Lets see if my earnings double or triple.

Oh and please, chill. I am stating my opinion and I feel that it still stands as it is. But since Josh Lim states that advertlets work differently from that (which i don't see but I don't mind.) all is well i guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If thats the case, I&#8217;ll be using a frame and putting 20 ads at one shot in that small frame. I&#8217;ll see how it goes. I&#8217;m sorry but I think i clarified that the advertisers pay for less. The title is well, misleading? But I did write in the post that I feel that advertisers are not paying for what they deserve. Anyways, since its not of a problem, I shall put loads of ads as well, but in a smart way of course. Lets see if my earnings double or triple.</p>
<p>Oh and please, chill. I am stating my opinion and I feel that it still stands as it is. But since Josh Lim states that advertlets work differently from that (which i don&#8217;t see but I don&#8217;t mind.) all is well i guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motd</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>motd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Side track abit.

@Pingster

I agree with your point but sometimes it is just kind of hard to know what kind of content you are blogging will get you into trouble. After all not all of us reads Law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Side track abit.</p>
<p>@Pingster</p>
<p>I agree with your point but sometimes it is just kind of hard to know what kind of content you are blogging will get you into trouble. After all not all of us reads Law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Pingster: This is more of a customer/public misunderstanding how the company works. It may be bad for the company reputation if the issues raised aren't properly addressed. But I think Josh did a good job in addressing the issue.

Its good that swift raised this issue. This give Josh a chance to clear the misunderstanding. Cheers.

BTW: Are you from ping.sg? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pingster: This is more of a customer/public misunderstanding how the company works. It may be bad for the company reputation if the issues raised aren&#8217;t properly addressed. But I think Josh did a good job in addressing the issue.</p>
<p>Its good that swift raised this issue. This give Josh a chance to clear the misunderstanding. Cheers.</p>
<p>BTW: Are you from ping.sg? <img src='http://www.swiftworld.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pingster</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Pingster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I am works in a firm that handles legal matters concerning the internet.

I am really shocked to see how bloggers these days are committing themselves to stupid things like posting blogs with framing titles or accusing tone on fraud when things are not clarify.

For example, if one go around accusing this company of not providing a good service and without any clarification just blog about it, you are opening yourself to legal action. 

If not sure, at least put a question mark behind your Advertlets Advertisers Pay for Nothing? And not go into accusing tone.

Please do learn from this mistake. It is a matter of time one will get sue for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am works in a firm that handles legal matters concerning the internet.</p>
<p>I am really shocked to see how bloggers these days are committing themselves to stupid things like posting blogs with framing titles or accusing tone on fraud when things are not clarify.</p>
<p>For example, if one go around accusing this company of not providing a good service and without any clarification just blog about it, you are opening yourself to legal action. </p>
<p>If not sure, at least put a question mark behind your Advertlets Advertisers Pay for Nothing? And not go into accusing tone.</p>
<p>Please do learn from this mistake. It is a matter of time one will get sue for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Lim</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Hi Motd,

Yes, of course putting more ad units would result in better earnings. However, we recommend varying the sizes - try to use different ad sizes instead of the same ones. Eg, if you already have the Sidebar (165x240) ad format installed, try the Rectangle (336x280), the Banner (468x60) and the Square (180x150). Certain ad formats have advertisers that are not available in other formats. 

Thanks for understanding. As much as we'll like to be open about our inner workings, it is in the best interest for advertisers and bloggers for some confidential algorithms not to be disclosed. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Motd,</p>
<p>Yes, of course putting more ad units would result in better earnings. However, we recommend varying the sizes - try to use different ad sizes instead of the same ones. Eg, if you already have the Sidebar (165&#215;240) ad format installed, try the Rectangle (336&#215;280), the Banner (468&#215;60) and the Square (180&#215;150). Certain ad formats have advertisers that are not available in other formats. </p>
<p>Thanks for understanding. As much as we&#8217;ll like to be open about our inner workings, it is in the best interest for advertisers and bloggers for some confidential algorithms not to be disclosed. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motd</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>motd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>If the above method does really work as you suggest, I am going to put more ads units from now on.

I don't think Josh will reveal much about how Advertlets works behind the scene but I don't think Advertlets would do that to their advertiser which is their source of income.

I am still a noob in all this make money out of your blog after all this time. Maybe I miss out something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the above method does really work as you suggest, I am going to put more ads units from now on.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Josh will reveal much about how Advertlets works behind the scene but I don&#8217;t think Advertlets would do that to their advertiser which is their source of income.</p>
<p>I am still a noob in all this make money out of your blog after all this time. Maybe I miss out something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Lim</title>
		<link>http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swiftworld.net/2007/11/13/advertlets-advertisers-pay-for-nothing/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>To answer your question, the impressions are counted as ads are shown, however, the earnings are calculated based on the quality of traffic or the individual performance of each blog. 

Keep in mind also that your earnings may increase from ads that you cannot see (for example, from Malaysia different ads are shown), and that there are also other visitors visiting your site too. If you were the only visitor to your own blog, that'll be quite sad right :)

Ultimately I wouldn't worry too much about it if I were you. We've implemented most of our advertisers suggested ideas and features, and successfully sold different CPC, CPM as well as some custom packages to many advertisers, and they are quite pleased with the performance. On your end, I hope you're happy with your earnings. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your question, the impressions are counted as ads are shown, however, the earnings are calculated based on the quality of traffic or the individual performance of each blog. </p>
<p>Keep in mind also that your earnings may increase from ads that you cannot see (for example, from Malaysia different ads are shown), and that there are also other visitors visiting your site too. If you were the only visitor to your own blog, that&#8217;ll be quite sad right <img src='http://www.swiftworld.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ultimately I wouldn&#8217;t worry too much about it if I were you. We&#8217;ve implemented most of our advertisers suggested ideas and features, and successfully sold different CPC, CPM as well as some custom packages to many advertisers, and they are quite pleased with the performance. On your end, I hope you&#8217;re happy with your earnings. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
